Talk:Panama (Nova)/@comment-32600953-20170718154933: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>Tailz8003 (Created page with "I knew the server had more honour then, even ''outposts'' would be removed by a fight. Nowadays, those are placed into other territories with the expectation that they would ...") |
>Tailz8003 No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I knew the server had more honour then, even ''outposts'' would be removed by a fight. | I knew the server had more honour then, even ''outposts'' would be removed by a fight. | ||
Nowadays, those are placed into other territories with the expectation that they would either stay permanently, or the player who places them would get themselves banned for doing something stupid, and the lingering outpost would eventually go away after 40 days. | Nowadays, those are placed into other territories with the expectation that they would either stay permanently, or the player who places them would get themselves banned for doing something stupid, and the lingering outpost would eventually go away after 40 days. Would a skirmish remove them? They don't even care about their lives in real life, much less in-game. You could kill them 50 times, and strip them of everything they have, and they would still refuse to remove it. | ||
You may thank Praxis for | You may thank Praxis for inspiring that mentality. | ||
Revision as of 17:52, 18 July 2017
I knew the server had more honour then, even outposts would be removed by a fight.
Nowadays, those are placed into other territories with the expectation that they would either stay permanently, or the player who places them would get themselves banned for doing something stupid, and the lingering outpost would eventually go away after 40 days. Would a skirmish remove them? They don't even care about their lives in real life, much less in-game. You could kill them 50 times, and strip them of everything they have, and they would still refuse to remove it.
You may thank Praxis for inspiring that mentality.