Unitary state: Difference between revisions

sayerleft (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
sayerleft (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:


== Devolution compared with federalism ==
== Devolution compared with federalism ==
A unitary system of government can be considered to be the opposite of federalism. In federations, the provincial/regional governments share powers with the central government as equal actors through a written constitution, to which the consent of both is required to make amendments. This means that the sub-national units have a right to existence and powers that cannot be unilaterally changed by the central government.
A unitary system of government can be considered to be the opposite of federalism. In federations, or mega-nations, the provincial/regional/state governments share powers with the central government as equal actors through a written or unwritten constitution in which both play a part. This means that the sub-national units have a right to existence and powers that cannot be unilaterally changed by the central government.


There are, however, similarities between federalism and devolution. Devolution within a unitary state, like federalism, may be symmetrical, with all sub-national units having the same powers and status, or asymmetric, with sub-national units varying in their powers and status. Many unitary states have no areas possessing a degree of autonomy. In such countries, sub-national regions cannot decide their own laws. Examples are Romania, Ireland and Norway.
[[File:The pathway of regional integration or separation.png|center|thumb|700x700px]]
[[File:The pathway of regional integration or separation.png|center|thumb|700x700px]]