Talk:Second Spanish Republic (Classic)/@comment-33409966-20171129231010: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 23:27, 6 January 2023

.

Revision as of 01:10, 30 November 2017 (view source) >Brendan1903 (Created page with "Why is land that is clearly in Canada, in the Spanish map, and Why does Spain control florida, and all of the Carribean, when that is easily proven false. Considering Texas is...")		Latest revision as of 23:27, 6 January 2023 (view source) mushhushshu (talk \| contribs) m (358276345802784768 moved page Talk:Second Spanish Republic/@comment-33409966-20171129231010 to Talk:Second Spanish Republic (Classic)/@comment-33409966-20171129231010)
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Why is land that is clearly in Canada, in the Spanish map, and Why does Spain control florida, and all of the Carribean, when that is easily proven false~~. ~~Considering Texas is a mess of small inactive city states, what gives spain the right that they get to own all of it, when they have 1 town there? Didn't Spain agree that Baja California was Canadian?~~		.