Nonpartisan proportionality: Difference between revisions

sayerleft (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
sayerleft (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 671: Line 671:
===Benefits===
===Benefits===
Advocates for NPV argue it is an improvement over winner-take-all non-proportional voting systems such as first-past-the-post, where vote splits commonly result in a majority of voters electing no one and the successful candidate having support from just a minority of the district voters. NPV prevents in most cases one party taking all the seats and in its thinning out of the candidates in the field prevents the election of an extreme candidate or party or group if it does not have enough overall general appeal.
Advocates for NPV argue it is an improvement over winner-take-all non-proportional voting systems such as first-past-the-post, where vote splits commonly result in a majority of voters electing no one and the successful candidate having support from just a minority of the district voters. NPV prevents in most cases one party taking all the seats and in its thinning out of the candidates in the field prevents the election of an extreme candidate or party or group if it does not have enough overall general appeal.
{{DEFAULTSORT:Single Transferable Vote}}
[[Category:Single transferable vote| ]]
[[Category:Non-monotonic electoral systems]]
[[Category:Preferential electoral systems]]
[[Category:Proportional representation electoral systems]]
[[Category:Electoral systems]]
[[Category:Electoral reform in Canada]]