Akeboun v. Moxie: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|concurrence1=WrestlingWithGod | |concurrence1=WrestlingWithGod | ||
|concurrence2=Aurivia | |concurrence2=Aurivia | ||
|lawsapplied=Pub.L. 4-1; Nat. Const. art. I | |lawsapplied=[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ftnmqp_sQ1xTG0l0l4WZe4EE-5A9MZLIjKdOy406bUs/edit Pub.L. 4-1]; [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yMHbF3_LMXcxvepi-jmDul4orlqx-p0gL7CoHxMf2oc/edit?usp=sharing Nat. Const. art. I] | ||
}}'''''Akeboun v. Moxies_hoe''''', 26 CSC. 523 (2023/5), was a landmark decision of the [[Supreme Court of Cascadia]] in which the Court upheld the Anti-Discrimination Act and extended its coverage to also include protection from discrimination based off of political opinion. | }}'''''Akeboun v. Moxies_hoe''''', 26 CSC. 523 (2023/5), was a landmark decision of the [[Supreme Court of Cascadia]] in which the Court upheld the Anti-Discrimination Act and extended its coverage to also include protection from discrimination based off of political opinion. |
Revision as of 06:46, 21 June 2023
|
Akeboun v. Moxies_hoe, 26 CSC. 523 (2023/5), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Cascadia in which the Court upheld the Anti-Discrimination Act and extended its coverage to also include protection from discrimination based off of political opinion.