Akeboun v. Moxie: Difference between revisions

From EarthMC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
|concurrence2=Aurivia
|concurrence2=Aurivia
|lawsapplied=Pub.L. 4-1; Nat. Const. art. I
|lawsapplied=Pub.L. 4-1; Nat. Const. art. I
}}'''''Akeboun v. Moxies_hoe''''', 26 CSC. 523 (2023/5), was a landmark
}}'''''Akeboun v. Moxies_hoe''''', 26 CSC. 523 (2023/5), was a landmark decision of the [[Supreme Court of Cascadia]] in which the Court upheld the Anti-Discrimination Act and extended its coverage to also include protection from discrimination based off of political opinion.
 
 
L Sayer imagine messing up a wiki page couldnt be me
 
-Aghast

Revision as of 07:27, 21 June 2023

Akeboun v. Moxie
Coat of Arms of Cascadia.png
Supreme Court of Cascadia
Filed May 1, 2023
Argued May 5, 2023
Reargued
Decided May 14, 2023
Full Case Name Akeboun v. Moxies_hoe
Citations
Filing
Argument Argument
Reargument
Decision Decision
Related cases Cascadia v. AllStarPro90
Case history
Prior
Subsequent
Holding
The ruling in Cascadia v. AllStarPro90 is upheld and the Anti-Discrimination Act's coverage is extended to political opinion, with Moxies_hoe being fined 130g; however with the court recommending for the Anti-Discrimination Act to be repealed and for the precedent of the court's jurisprudence to be based on Discord Terms of Service.
Court membership
Chief Justice
WrestlingWithGod
Associate Justices
Aurivia • Beamz30
Case opinions
Majority Beamz30, joined by WrestlingWithGod and Aurivia
Concurrence WrestlingWithGod
Concurrence Aurivia
Concurrence
Concurrence
Dissent
Dissent
Dissent
Recused:
Laws applied
Pub.L. 4-1; Nat. Const. art. I
Overruled by

Akeboun v. Moxies_hoe, 26 CSC. 523 (2023/5), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Cascadia in which the Court upheld the Anti-Discrimination Act and extended its coverage to also include protection from discrimination based off of political opinion.