Second Falklands-Malvinas War: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 78: / Line 78: @@
 === '''Neutral conclusions''' ===
-The existence of both an Argentinian and British Falkland, and the existence of a previous conflict between both nations, solidifies the argument that a possible peace between both nations, without the anexation of one another, would have been impossible. Argentinian interest in maintaining part of the island as a sign of pride and conduct of the island as an sphere of influence in South America; and Joel infuriating attitude and tries of anti-Argentinian propaganda mobilization (which was somewhat limited, but successful with the involvement of Inca in the War); would have make completely impossible any peace of the island.
+The existence of an Argentinian and British Falkland solidifies the argument that a possible peace between both nations, without the annexation of one another, would have been impossible. Argentinian interest in maintaining part of the island as a sign of pride and conduct of the island as an sphere of influence in South America; and Joel infuriating attitude and tries of anti-Argentinian propaganda mobilization (which was somewhat limited, but successful with the involvement of Inca and Inchodina in the War); would have make completely impossible any sign of peace of mutual cooperation.
 == Timeline ==