Moxification
Moxification is a political phenomenon characterized by the transformation of a controversial or erratic public figure, often referred to as a "lolcow," into an established member of the political elite without significantly altering their behavior. This process typically involves the public and political establishment gradually accepting or overlooking the figure's past missteps and controversial actions, often due to their longevity in office, occasional beneficial contributions, or simply the passage of time.
The term originates from Moxicodone, the 7th Secretary of the Interior of Cascadia, whose political career exemplified this phenomenon. Despite being initially perceived as a "lolcow" - an internet slang term for a person who attracts mockery or derision through their actions - and self-identifying as mentally ill, Moxicodone eventually became an established political figure in Cascadian politics over the course of their terms in the House, Cabinet, or via presidential runs.
Origins and etymology
The term "Moxification" is a portmanteau of "Moxicodone" and "fication," drawing parallels to other political science terms like "Pasokification." It was coined to describe the unique trajectory of Moxicodone's career and has since been applied to similar cases in other political contexts.
Characteristics
Moxification is typically characterized by several key elements:
- Initial perception as a "lolcow" or controversial figure
- A history of erratic or detrimental actions
- Gradual acceptance by the political establishment
- Lack of significant behavioral change in the individual
- Public forgiveness or forgetfulness of past controversies
- Attainment of established political status
Examples
Cascadia: Moxicodone
The archetypal example of Moxification is Moxicodone's political career in Cascadia. Despite actions that were widely perceived as detrimental to national security, such as:
- Deleting the town of Oceanside, resulting in a loss of nearly 2,000 gold for the nation
- Allowing an enemy nation to take control of a core area of Metropolitan Cascadia
Moxicodone eventually transitioned from being viewed as a liability to becoming an established political figure. This transformation occurred without significant changes in behavior, but rather through a combination of experience, occasional beneficial actions, and the public's tendency to forget or forgive past controversies.
Analysis and implications
The phenomenon of Moxification raises several questions about political accountability, public memory, and the nature of political establishments. Critics argue that it represents a failure of democratic systems to hold politicians accountable for their actions, while others suggest it demonstrates the capacity for political redemption and the importance of long-term contributions over isolated incidents.
Some political scientists have noted that Moxification may be more likely to occur in smaller or newer political entities, where the pool of experienced politicians is limited, and unconventional figures may have more opportunities to establish themselves in positions of power.
Criticism
The concept of Moxification has been criticized by some political analysts who argue that it oversimplifies complex political careers and may downplay genuine growth or change in politicians over time. Others contend that the term unfairly stigmatizes politicians with mental health challenges or unconventional backgrounds.