Nostra talk:Circassia

Biased statements presented as fact.

On the subject of "Minor Setbacks and the Mosque". There are parts of the text that needs to be modified as it uses unsupported adjectives.

"The traitorous mayors" -> The secedding mayors

"Tuapse was renamed to the gibberish "Suayp" -> Tuapse was renamed to "Suayp"

"The backwater territory of Tuapse" -> The territory of tuapse

"to the Circassian trial chamber, leadership anticipated" -> to the Circassian trial chamber, Circassian leadership anticipated

" the traumatized mayor was observed wandering his territory completely empty-handed" -> The mayor of ____ was observed (by who??) wandering his territory completely empty-handed.

"The traitorous mayor of the secessionist town of Suayp (formerly Tuapse) found himself ruling over an undeveloped, poorly shaped territory with only a single resident." -> "The mayor of the seccionist town of Suayp .... ruling in a single resident town"

"retort using a Latin phrase he had likely gleaned from pop culture or Wikipedia" -> Without proof this is just smearing.

" Later, in an attempt to mark his territory or inflict harm," How is this known?