Second Crusade of EarthMC
The Second Crusade of EarthMC was a Crusade declared by the EarthMC Catholic Church against the Kingdom of Francia. The crusade began on July 3rd, 2021 after the excommunication of Thanamos and ended on September 15th 2021 with the signing of The Apostolic Accords. The conflict stands as one of the defining moments in EarthMC Nova’s history, characterized by large-scale military mobilization, significant human cost, sophisticated propaganda strategies, and enduring geopolitical repercussions across Europe.
| |||||||||||||||||||||
History
I.Background
I.1 A Kingdom Divided: Fracture and the Struggle for Legitimacy in Francia
On March 14, 2021, following mounting internal tensions within France, the towns of Champagne, Auvergne, Dauphiné, Provence, and Normandy seceded and proclaimed the creation of the new nation of Francia, formally renouncing their oath of allegiance to King Cactusinapumpkin of France. This event marked the beginning of the French Civil War.
From its inception, the young Kingdom of Francia faced a significant legitimacy crisis. Lacking international recognition and struggling to assert itself on the European political stage, the new monarchy undertook numerous diplomatic initiatives, including outreach efforts toward states such as Finland. These attempts, however, yielded limited success.
Adopting a distinctly medieval and feudal roleplay framework, the Francian monarchy increasingly turned toward the Roman Catholic Church as a potential source of moral and political legitimacy. At a time when the Church was expanding its influence across EarthMC Nova, Francia multiplied symbolic and diplomatic gestures: papal visits were encouraged, banquets and official celebrations were organized, and episcopal appointments were supported in order to promote the spread of the Catholic faith within its territory.
Strategically, Francia sought to present itself as a defender and champion of Christendom in contrast to France, which it portrayed as "pagan" or "insufficiently aligned with the Christian order". By positioning itself as the legitimate Catholic kingdom in Western Europe, the Francian monarchy hoped to secure diplomatic backing and political recognition from the Holy See, thereby strengthening its claim to sovereignty on the international stage.
It was within this context that Francia undertook the construction of what was described as the largest cathedral in Christendom after St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome: the Cathedral of Notre-Dame de Reims. Beyond its architectural ambition, the project carried strong symbolic value, serving as a monumental affirmation of Francia’s Catholic identity and its claim to spiritual legitimacy.
Over time, the cathedral would come to embody the spiritual aspirations of the Francian monarchy and later emerge as a central symbolic stake in the tensions that ultimately led to the Second Crusade.
I.2 Between Two Thrones: The Church’s Strategy of Neutrality
Throughout 2020 and into early 2021, the EarthMC Catholic Church experienced a period of significant expansion. The Papacy multiplied international visits and public addresses, promoting a message centered on peace, mediation, and religious consolidation across the server. In various conflicts, such as the Philippine Civil War, the Church notably refrained from taking sides, instead calling for dialogue and compromise between the belligerents.
It was within this broader diplomatic framework that Pope Benedict XVII sought to address the growing instability in France. Rather than endorsing either Francia or the Kingdom of France, the Papacy attempted to initiate dialogue between the two factions, multiplying visits, communications, and symbolic gestures aimed at de-escalation.
However, this balanced posture was interpreted differently by each side. Francia increasingly viewed papal engagement as an opportunity to reinforce its own legitimacy. France, meanwhile, was deeply preoccupied with internal succession disputes and ideological tensions. At the time, segments of the French realm promoted a revival of pagan practices, including the controversial “Pissist” movement, which publicly distanced itself from Christian symbolism. In response, the Church supported efforts to re-establish Catholic structures within France, including the appointment of Karnakus as Archbishop of France and the construction of Notre-Dame Cathedral in Paris as a visible reaffirmation of Christian presence.
The Holy See thus adopted a dual-track approach. While it sought to maintain the Catholic faith in Francia, it simultaneously prioritized the evangelization and religious stabilization of France. The Vatican’s official line remained consistent: peace and compromise were to prevail over the elevation of any single “champion of Christendom.” The Church’s objective was not to legitimize one faction over the other, but to preserve unity within the broader Christian community of EarthMC Nova.
I.3 Ultimatum and Rupture: The Path to the Second Crusade
By mid-2021, a combination of personal, political, and religious tensions had created an increasingly volatile situation. King Thanamos was widely perceived as assertive and confrontational in his political style, while the Papacy maintained a policy of deliberate ambiguity and mediation. This divergence in temperament and strategy would prove decisive.
During the construction of Notre-Dame Cathedral of Reims, tensions escalated on the ground. French loyalist forces reportedly claimed a plot directly facing the cathedral site and constructed a deliberately provocative structure intended to obstruct and disrupt the architectural project. The incident was perceived by Francia as both symbolic harassment and a political challenge to its religious ambitions.
Further incidents compounded the deterioration of relations. Members affiliated with France allegedly disrupted religious services within Francian territory, including the use of invisibility potions to interfere with Catholic ceremonies. Despite mounting complaints, the Papacy declined to intervene directly, reiterating its commitment to compromise and non-partisanship.
From the Vatican’s perspective, its position remained precarious. The Church’s influence in both France and Francia was fragile, and overt alignment with one faction risked alienating the other. Maintaining equilibrium was therefore considered essential to preserving broader Christian unity.
However, escalating tensions on Discord and in diplomatic exchanges intensified the crisis. Thanamos formally demanded concrete action from Pope Benedict XVII, including public denunciations of France. The Pope refused, reaffirming the Church’s neutral stance.
Interpreting this refusal as a denial of the moral and political legitimacy he had sought, Thanamos moved decisively. On June 23, 2021, following a series of irreconcilable disputes, he rejected the authority of the Roman Church and proclaimed the establishment of the Apostolic Church as the sole legitimate church within Francia.
In response, Pope Benedict XVII excommunicated Thanamos. Subsequent negotiations failed to restore relations, and on July 4, 2021, Benedict XVII formally proclaimed the Second Crusade of EarthMC.
II.The second EarthMC Crusade war
II.1 Mobilization and Diplomatic Alignments
Following Pope Benedict XVII’s formal proclamation of crusade, a significant number of nations across EarthMC declared war on Francia. Major European powers, including the Eastern Roman Empire (GRE) and Spain, answered the papal call, rapidly consolidating what became known as the Crusader coalition. The immediate effect was the diplomatic isolation of Francia on the European stage.
In contrast, Francian support remained limited. The most notable backing came from the Victorian Empire in Australia, a largely Francophone polity that maintained cultural and political affinities with Francia. Victorian leadership argued that the Papacy had failed to provide adequate support or protection to Francia during earlier tensions, and thus aligned itself against the Crusader bloc.
As the conflict expanded, numerous nations chose sides, not purely out of religious conviction, but due to pre-existing rivalries, geopolitical calculations, and strategic alignments. The war thus evolved beyond a strictly theological confrontation and became a broader geopolitical struggle.
At various moments, the United Kingdom offered limited assistance to Francia, motivated in part by its rivalry with the Eastern Roman Empire. Conversely, states such as Israel aligned with the Papacy, influenced by diplomatic tensions and opposition toward Francian policy. These shifting alliances underscored the extent to which the conflict reflected deeper political fractures within the European sphere.
Despite these dynamics, the balance of power at the outbreak of hostilities overwhelmingly favored the Crusader coalition. In terms of declared support, military manpower, and diplomatic recognition, the papal camp significantly outnumbered Francia and its allies. Furthermore, Francia faced widespread economic and diplomatic pressure, including coordinated embargo measures from numerous states, further compounding its isolation at the onset of the war.
It was within this context of strategic encirclement that, on July 19, 2021, Francia, alongside Poland, Serbia, and Ancient_Egypt established the League of Free Nations. This coalition represented a concerted effort to counter diplomatic isolation and break the effective blockade imposed by the Crusader-aligned states. Though initially limited in scale, the League would later prove crucial in coordinating military operations and sustaining Francia’s war effort during the conflict’s most intense phases.
II.2 Early Engagements and Escalation
The initial phase of the crusade was characterized less by large-scale confrontations and more by scattered skirmishes and symbolic operations. While Francia was engaged in consolidating its internal position, most notably through military pressure against the city of Colmar, which had established itself north of Auvergne, the Crusader coalition was simultaneously organizing its command structure.
Under the leadership of Consul and General Fritz of the Eastern Roman Empire, the Crusader forces began coordinating early offensive actions. These initial engagements were limited in scale but deliberately provocative. Rather than seeking decisive territorial gains, both sides focused on demonstrations of presence, mobility, and resolve.
Among the first recorded incidents were targeted raids on Francian agricultural infrastructure. A small mercenary group led by Cardinal Minister_Miong reportedly attacked the fields near Reims, killing livestock and disrupting food production. Though militarily minor, such actions carried symbolic weight, signaling that the conflict would extend beyond formal declarations and into sustained harassment operations.
In response, Francia dispatched a force toward the Vatican in what was widely interpreted as a symbolic show of strength rather than a genuine attempt at conquest. At the time of the maneuver, Vatican defenses were unmanned, and no significant resistance occurred. The action thus functioned more as a political statement than as a meaningful military victory.
Overall, these early confrontations reflected a war still in its testing phase. Both coalitions sought to display mobilization capacity and commitment, probing each other’s readiness while avoiding full-scale engagement. The conflict had clearly moved beyond rhetoric, yet it had not yet reached the level of coordinated mass warfare that would later define its most decisive moments.
II.3 The Battle of Paris
By late summer 2021, tensions had reached a critical threshold. On August 21, 2021, following the inauguration of St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome, Pope Benedict XVII took advantage of the large gathering of faithful and allied forces to publicly reaffirm the crusade and call for a direct confrontation with Francia. What followed would become the largest organized battle of the conflict and one of the largest engagements in EarthMC Nova at the time.
The confrontation took place east of Paris, along the banks of the Seine, near what later became known as the “Bridge of Victory.” Pope Benedict XVII personally rallied approximately thirty experienced soldiers drawn from multiple nations within the Crusader coalition. Operational command was entrusted to Consul and General Fritz of the Eastern Roman Empire.
Facing them, Thanamos was initially able to muster only six core knights before reinforcements from members of the League of Free Nations began to arrive. Aware of his numerical inferiority, he opted for a defensive strategy. The Francian forces hastily constructed improvised palisades, trenches, and concealed traps across the terrain of Champagne, deliberately drawing the Crusader army into an area where Towny permissions and territorial familiarity offered a tactical advantage.
Coordination issues soon emerged within the Crusader ranks. Elements of the attacking force advanced prematurely and without unified command structure, triggering defensive traps and becoming isolated. Francian defenders capitalized on these mistakes, inflicting significant casualties during the early phase of the engagement.
As the battle intensified, command cohesion deteriorated. Reports indicate that General Fritz withdrew from the frontline, leaving operational leadership increasingly decentralized. Pope Benedict XVII remained present, though lacking extensive battlefield experience. The situation threatened to escalate into a complete rout of the Crusader forces.
The battle was partially stabilized by the intervention of additional powers entering the field. Some, such as Israel, appeared motivated as much by the pursuit of military engagement and prestige as by religious alignment. The United Kingdom also intervened in support of Francia, reflecting the complex geopolitical rivalries underpinning the broader conflict.
The fighting evolved into a prolonged and chaotic melee, marked by heavy casualties on both sides. Ultimately, Crusader forces signaled retreat, and Francia retained control of the battlefield. Tactically, the victory was decisive.
Strategically, however, the outcome was more ambiguous. Francia suffered substantial losses in personnel and equipment, including valuable enchanted gear. The scale of mobilization required to secure the victory placed considerable strain on the kingdom’s resources and contributed to the gradual transformation of the conflict into a prolonged war of attrition.
The Battle of Paris thus stands as both the high point of Francian military resistance and the moment at which the crusade shifted from rapid escalation to sustained exhaustion.
II.4 Stalemate and War of Propaganda
Following the Battle of Paris, the conflict entered a phase of military stalemate. The scale of the engagement had demonstrated both the limits and the costs of direct confrontation. Within the Crusader camp, it became increasingly apparent that a decisive victory would not be achieved solely through armed force. The struggle, therefore, began to shift from the battlefield to the realm of narrative and influence : not by the sword, but by the pen.
As large-scale engagements became less frequent, media outreach and information campaigns grew in prominence. Public statements, battle photographs, screenshots, and commentary videos circulated widely across EarthMC platforms, seeking to frame the conflict in moral, religious, and political terms. The war expanded beyond physical combat into a contest over legitimacy, perception, and international opinion.
Among the most visible contributors to this media environment was the YouTuber Beaverman, who produced a series of videos sharply critical of Thanamos and the Kingdom of Francia while expressing support for the Catholic cause. Although not formally affiliated with Church leadership, his content amplified pro-crusade narratives and contributed to the broader climate of polarization.
Francia responded with official communications and counter-statements. However, throughout much of the summer of 2021, it struggled to maintain visibility on the international stage. Diplomatic isolation and sustained embargo pressure reduced its capacity to shape global discourse, leaving it increasingly reactive rather than proactive in the information war.
Following the Battle of Paris, open confrontation slowed noticeably. While the conflict remained unresolved, a strategic pause emerged. The immediate threat to Francia no longer appeared to stem primarily from external military pressure, but from mounting internal strain within the kingdom itself.
II.5 Internal Instability and the Decline of the Apostolic Church
The Structural Weakness of the Apostolic Church
The Apostolic Church was conceived as a dual response to the crisis facing Francia: first, to provide explicit Christian legitimacy to the kingdom; and second, to compete with the authority of the Roman Catholic Church. In doing so, it sought to resolve the political and religious tensions that had escalated during the early phases of the conflict.
Ideologically, the Apostolic Church represented a hybrid framework. Observers have described it as combining elements reminiscent of Protestant traditions, certain medieval dissident movements such as Cathar or Waldensian influences, and aspects comparable to national Anglican structures. It was structured as a national church, exclusive to Francia, and did not pursue universal evangelization. Its leadership model centered on a Matriarch : Cinnamon, reflecting a departure from traditional Catholic ecclesiastical hierarchy.
The Church also promoted a strong link between royal authority and divine sanction, reinforcing the notion that spiritual and political sovereignty were intertwined. This alignment initially served Francia’s objective of consolidating internal legitimacy.
However, the institution faced significant structural challenges. Unlike the EMC Roman Church, which possessed a year of hierarchical development and doctrinal organization, the Apostolic Church lacked a clearly defined ecclesiastical framework. Its internal governance, clerical training, and liturgical structure remained underdeveloped. The absence of a robust doctrinal hierarchy limited its capacity to respond coherently to theological questions or to provide consistent religious guidance.
Furthermore, its national and politically centered nature constrained its broader credibility. While intended to resolve Francia’s legitimacy dilemma, the Apostilic Church struggled to establish itself as a stable and enduring religious institution. Reports suggest that some clergy within Francia continued, discreetly, to maintain spiritual affiliation with Rome, reflecting ongoing uncertainty regarding the Apostolic Church’s theological foundation.
Over time, these structural limitations weakened the Church’s authority. Rather than fully addressing the legitimacy crisis that had prompted its creation, the institution increasingly appeared fragile in doctrinal and organizational terms, reducing its effectiveness as both a religious and political instrument.
Political Crisis in Francia and the Road to the Apostolic Accords
Following the victory at Paris, King Thanamos convened the Estates General in September 2021 in an effort to consolidate internal support and reassess the kingdom’s strategic direction. The gathering of the Francian nobility reflected both the importance of the moment and the growing awareness that the war had entered a new and uncertain phase.
Despite the tactical success achieved on the battlefield, the prolonged mobilization had severely strained the kingdom’s resources. Francia was effectively engaged on two fronts: the ongoing civil war against France and the escalating confrontation with the Papacy. The cumulative military effort placed increasing pressure on manpower, equipment, and economic stability.
At the same time, Thanamos’ political authority faced mounting scrutiny within segments of the nobility. While still respected for his leadership during the Battle of Paris, questions emerged regarding the sustainability of continued confrontation with Rome and the broader strategic direction of the kingdom.
Stabilization efforts were largely attributed to the intervention of Prince CorbeauNoiraud and the newly appointed Prime Minister, Idolized_Crow. Conducting a comprehensive assessment of the kingdom’s structural challenges, the ministerial leadership concluded that Francia could no longer afford to sustain simultaneous religious and civil conflicts.
A decisive shift followed. After internal deliberations, the Francian government opted to cease financial and institutional support for the Apostolic Church. The priority was redirected toward resolving the domestic civil war, particularly as the province of Provence entered into rebellion, further complicating the internal situation.
It was in the aftermath of these deliberations that Thanamos and Cinnamon initiated negotiations with Pope Benedict XVII and his legates. The transition from confrontation to diplomacy marked a recognition that the continuation of the crusade posed greater risks to Francia’s stability than its resolution.
The Apostolic Accords and the End of the Conflict
(see : The Apostolic Accords)
On September 15, 2021, representatives of Francia and the Roman Catholic Church formally signed the Apostolic Accords, bringing the Second Crusade of EarthMC to an official close. The agreement confirmed the dissolution of the Apostolic Church and the reintegration of Francia into communion with Rome.
For the Holy See, the accords represented a significant political and symbolic victory. Without achieving a decisive military conquest, the Papacy had reaffirmed its religious authority and moral primacy within the Christian sphere of EarthMC Nova. The outcome strengthened the perception of Rome as the central and enduring spiritual power capable of weathering schism and confrontation.
For Francia, however, the settlement carried a different weight. Although the kingdom had demonstrated notable military resilience (most prominently at the Battle of Paris) its attempt to establish a rival ecclesiastical institution ultimately proved unsustainable. The dissolution of the Apostolic Church marked the end of a bold but short-lived experiment in religious sovereignty.
While the accords restored formal religious unity, they also underscored the limits of political rupture in a landscape where spiritual legitimacy remained deeply intertwined with international recognition. The war had not been decided solely on the battlefield; it had been resolved through endurance, institutional strength, and strategic recalibration.
Aftermath
The Consolidation of Papal Authority
The outcome of the Second Crusade significantly reinforced the authority of the EarthMC Catholic Church on the international stage. Although the conflict did not end in a decisive military conquest, the Papacy achieved its central objective: the preservation of ecclesiastical unity and the dissolution of a rival national church.
The successful reintegration of Francia into communion with Rome strengthened the perception of the Holy See as the ultimate arbiter of Christian legitimacy within EarthMC Nova. The conflict demonstrated that even in the face of open schism and military resistance, the institutional continuity of the Roman Church could prevail through diplomatic endurance and moral positioning.
In the aftermath of the war, the Church’s influence expanded. Its ability to mobilize a broad coalition of states under religious justification enhanced its credibility and consolidated its role as a central actor in European geopolitics.
Political Repercussions in Francia
For Francia, the consequences were profound. The end of the crusade did not immediately restore political stability. On the contrary, internal tensions deepened in its wake.
Segments of the nobility, particularly in Normandy and Provence, expressed dissatisfaction with the direction of royal policy during the conflict. The rebellion in Provence, combined with broader aristocratic discontent, weakened Thanamos’ position further.
The strain of prolonged war, economic pressure, and contested religious reforms culminated in a forced abdication. Thanamos ultimately relinquished the throne in favor of CorbeauNoiraud, marking the end of a turbulent political era. The transition signaled both an attempt at stabilization and a recognition that the legitimacy crisis of 2021 had not been fully resolved through military means.
A Lasting Legacy of Resentment
Beyond institutional outcomes, the conflict left a durable emotional imprint. Among segments of the Francian population, the memory of the crusade retained a tone of bitterness. While the Battle of Paris remained a source of pride, the dissolution of the Apostolic Church and the perceived moral defeat left a lingering sense of unfinished struggle.
Years later, narratives surrounding the Second Crusade continued to influence political rhetoric and identity formation within Francia. The war became not only a historical episode but a symbolic reference point in debates about sovereignty, faith, and national autonomy.
Sources and methodology
The primary sources used in the preparation of this article include archival material from the official Discord servers of Francia (https://discord.gg/Vd4N7aq84P) and the EarthMC Catholic Church (https://discord.gg/jpyEfgy) , as well as contemporary media coverage such as EMCL publications. Public announcements, diplomatic statements, and recorded in-game events constitute the core documentary basis of this reconstruction.
Where relevant, testimony from participants involved in the conflict has been considered in order to better understand the motivations, strategic calculations, and internal dynamics of the different parties. Any reference to private communications has been used cautiously and only when voluntarily shared by the actors concerned.
This article does not aim to provide an exhaustive chronological list of events. Rather, it adopts a historiographical approach, seeking to analyze the underlying motivations of the protagonists and to assess how their actions significantly impacted the geopolitical and religious landscape of EarthMC Nova between 2021 and 2022.
Given the nature of fan-driven historical documentation within a video game environment, this work remains open to revision. Constructive criticism, additional sources, and corrections are welcome, provided they contribute to a clearer understanding of the conflict within the analytical framework outlined above.